In the high-stakes world of employment law, overlooking joint employer status could cost your business dearly—and it might be your employees who point it out first! Imagine a scenario where a simple question from a worker triggers a federal investigation into your company's overtime practices. That's exactly what happened in a recent case, and it's a wake-up call for HR professionals everywhere. But here's where it gets controversial: What really defines a 'joint employer,' and could your business be unknowingly at risk? Let's break this down step by step, making sure even beginners can follow along.
We're talking about the Department of Labor's (DOL) latest Opinion Letter from September 30, 2025—specifically, FLSA2025-02. This guidance addresses whether two seemingly separate businesses can be considered joint employers under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which sets the rules for overtime pay. For those new to this, the FLSA is a key U.S. law ensuring fair wages, including requiring overtime pay at 1.5 times the regular rate for hours worked beyond 40 in a week. The big question here is joint employment: When multiple entities are involved, their hours might need to be combined to check for overtime eligibility.
Picture this real-life example: An employee worked at a restaurant and a nearby members-only club, both under different names but closely linked. She clocked in 40 hours or less each week at $28 an hour as a dinner hostess at the restaurant. Occasionally, while on duty there, she'd be sent to help at the club. When the club offered her four extra lunch shifts weekly, she inquired about overtime pay—and got a flat 'no.' The businesses justified this by citing separate structures, like different payroll systems and timekeeping methods.
But the DOL saw things differently. They declared the restaurant and club 'jointly and severally liable' for FLSA compliance, meaning both could be held responsible for violations. Key factors included their physical proximity—they were upstairs and downstairs in the same hotel—and shared elements like a common kitchen, identical menus, and overlapping management. Even though they had distinct teams, some supervisors worked in both spots, and they shared the same owners. Plus, the employee received the same pay rate, and the new shifts fit seamlessly into her schedule without conflicts.
This operational integration was crucial. Despite the separate payrolls—think different software and processes that might seem like a solid barrier—the DOL emphasized how intertwined the operations truly were. For example, if you have a hotel with a ground-floor eatery and an exclusive lounge upstairs, even with separate branding, shared resources could blur the lines. The bottom line? If her combined hours from both places topped 40 in a week, overtime was owed under FLSA rules.
And this is the part most people miss: The decision hinges on practical realities, not just paperwork. Is this fair, or does it unfairly burden businesses with complex setups? Some might argue it's a necessary safeguard to prevent wage theft, while others could see it as overreach on legitimate operational distinctions. What do you think—should the DOL prioritize shared ownership over separate payrolls, or is there a better way to define joint employment?
With HRMorning in your inbox, stay ahead of the curve on labor laws, benefits, and strategies for keeping talent engaged.
Free Training & Resources
Explore our White Papers for deep dives into HR topics, join Webinars for live expert insights, or check out Case Studies to learn from real-world scenarios.
The Cost of Noncompliance
You Be the Judge
Dive into these Case Studies to see how penalties can add up.
SPONSORED CONTENT
Discover innovative HR Technology solutions to streamline your processes, enhance Talent Management, and optimize Benefits including Health Care and Wellness programs.
Further Reading
Compensation Strategies: Navigating pay talks can feel tricky, but with the right approach, both HR pros and employees can make it productive. For instance, starting with open-ended questions can reveal what truly motivates your team.
Overtime Rule Updates: As federal regulators rethink the salary threshold for exempt roles, it's like a rollercoaster—full of ups and downs. Stay informed to ensure your compensation plans comply and avoid unexpected liabilities.
New W-2 Form Changes: The IRS's draft for 2026 includes updates from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, affecting how you report certain wages. Don't get caught off guard; review these changes to keep your payroll accurate.
Gender Pay Gap Insights: Women still earn about 83 cents for every dollar men make, per Payscale's 2025 report. This ongoing disparity highlights the need for equitable policies—perhaps through regular audits and transparent salary bands.
Expense Reimbursements as Wages: Automating reimbursements is efficient, but beware: Some expenses might qualify as taxable wages instead. For example, if an employee submits for a work-related meal, confirm it's truly a reimbursement, not compensation, to avoid tax pitfalls.
Spotlighting Pay Equity: Figures like Caitlin Clark, the WNBA star, have shone a light on wage differences in sports and beyond. If you're unfamiliar with her story, it's a compelling case of how public figures can drive conversations on fairness in pay.
What are your thoughts on this DOL ruling? Do you agree that shared operations trump separate payrolls, or is this interpretation too broad? Share your opinions in the comments—we'd love to hear your take and spark a discussion!
